Prof. KS Narayanacharya has given some hints in this book. Everyone knows that Nehru and Indira belonged to the Muslim community. But Gandhiji's caste origin proposal is less known to people.

Narayanacharya is not the kind of person who writes out of guilt or for fun. He had no idea of any political gain. So we can't completely ignore their issue. Let's take a look at the reasons they give here.

1. Mohandas Gandhi was the son of Karamchand Gandhi's fourth wife. Puthalibai originally belonged to the Pranami sect. This Pranami sect incorporates elements of both Muslim and Hindu religions. Anti-idol worship. An Islamic institution under Hindu guise.

2. Ghosh's book "The Quran and the Kafir" also mentions Gandhi's origin. Gandhi's father Karamchand worked under a Muslim landlord. Once he stole money from his landlord's house and ran away. Then the Muslim landlord took Karamchand's fourth wife to his house and made her his wife. Karamchand was in hiding for three years. It was then that Mohandas was born.

3. Gandhiji was born and brought up among Gujarati Muslims.

4. All the expenses of his schooling till college (London Law College) were taken care of by his Muslim parents.

5. Those who set up their legal practice in South Africa are also Muslims.

6. In London, Gandhi was a partner of the Anjuman-e-Islamia organisation. Next is the Muslim League.

So, it is not surprising to note that Gandhiji had pro-Muslim leanings. Not wrong. His final stand was "Even if Hindus are killed by Muslims, keep quiet. Don't be angry with them. We should not fear death. Let us die a heroic death." What does that mean? What should we say to those who want Hindus to tolerate this kind of stance?

At no point in the freedom struggle did Gandhiji take a pro-Hindu stand. He went on speaking in favor of Muslims. Not only that, whenever Hindus were killed, they never opposed it. Swami Shraddhananda's murder is a good example of this. Gandhiji did not condemn Rashid for the murder. Instead he preached to Hindus.

Next, Nehru made Asifa Ali, who advocated for Rashidan, the Indian ambassador to America. That defined all these relationships. Shouldn't all Gandhi's defenders answer these questions? Gandhi took the same stand when Bhagat Singh and other patriots were hanged. Gandhiji refused to sign the petition not to hang them. Why did they think the British were more important than these Indians? This doubt is natural. Such is his stance. We should note that Annie Besent herself condemned it.

Mountbatten says about Gandhiji on the one hand - He was not business minded/mannered. Look at his mischievous plan to surrender the whole of India to Jinnasaheb". Gandhiji had told Jinnah, "Make yourself the prime minister of a united India". But Nehru did not like this. Nehru, who was Gandhi's disciple till independence, no longer needed Gandhiji.

The work of the Congress organization was over. So Gandhi wanted congress to be dissolved but Nehru disagreed with Gandhi for dissolving it.

More of his idiocy : You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions. Let them take possession of your beautiful island, with your many beautiful buildings. You will give all these but neither your souls, nor your minds.

If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes, you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourself man, woman and child, to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them.