A man is dead. Amirul Hafiz Omar was not a headline before this. He was a 33-year-old warehouse worker, a delivery rider, a father buying a mathematics textbook for his eldest child. Now he is a case file, and the centre of a legal argument Malaysia rarely has the vocabulary to hold. 

The driver who hit him in Klang was allegedly intoxicated. The charge is murder. That decision has split opinion. Lawyers say the bar is too high. The public says the punishment has never been high enough. Both sides are arguing within a framework that may itself be the problem.  

Ketum

This is not just a question of whether this was murder. It is a question of whether Malaysian law has a proper name for what happened. Murder under Section 300 of the Penal Code is not simply causing death. It turns on the state of mind. Intention or knowledge. The threshold is severe. 

The act must be so dangerous that it would, in all probability, cause death. That is a difficult standard to meet. A driver does not leave home planning to kill. There is no target, no premeditation. What there is, instead, is a chain of decisions: drink, or take drugs; become impaired; choose to drive; choose to keep driving. 

The prosecution must turn that chain into something more than recklessness. It must show the accused knew death was not just a risk, but a likely outcome, and chose to act anyway. That is not an absurd argument. It is also not an easy one. And that is precisely the point. Malaysia already has laws for deaths caused by intoxicated driving. 

The Road Transport Act provides for prison terms, heavy fines and disqualification from driving. It recognises that such conduct kills. But it does not call it what the public increasingly feels it is. So when a case like this erupts, when the facts are stark and the loss is intimate, the system reaches upward. 

It stretches toward murder, the gravest label available, because everything below it feels insufficient. In doing so, it exposes a gap. We are left with an uneasy binary. Either this is a traffic offence, or it is murder. Either it is negligence, or it is intent. Either it carries the harshest label in law, or it risks being seen as another statistic on the road. 

Real life does not sit comfortably in that binary. There is a category of killing that is neither accidental nor intentional in the traditional sense. It is chosen risk. Conscious, repeated, widely understood risk taken in a way that endangers everyone else. It is not a momentary lapse but it is a decision to proceed despite knowing the danger. 

This is not just drink driving. It is intoxicated driving. Alcohol, drugs, anything that impairs judgment, followed by the decision to drive. Every adult understands what impairment does to reaction time. Every driver understands what a car can do to a human body. So when someone gets behind the wheel impaired, the question is no longer whether they intended to kill. 

It is whether the law should recognise that they knowingly entered a situation where death was a likely outcome. Right now, our legal system answers that question inconsistently. Sometimes such cases are treated as reckless driving. Sometimes harsher provisions are used. Now, in this case, the system is testing its outer limit with a murder charge. It may succeed, it may fail. 

Even if it succeeds, it will not resolve the underlying tension. It will simply show that, in some circumstances, a modern problem can be forced into an older legal mould. What it will not do is provide a clear and consistent way to deal with these deaths. That is the conversation we are not having. Instead, the outrage is drifting. 

There are calls to hold convenience stores responsible for selling alcohol. The anger is understandable. The focus is misplaced. We are drifting toward blaming the last place a drink was bought, instead of the first moment a decision was made. The choice to drive while impaired. 

The act that matters is not the sale. It is the decision. Amirul deserved more than this ambiguity. He deserved a system that does not have to stretch to name what took his life. The court will decide whether the murder charge stands. It should be tested rigorously, proved properly, or not at all.

This is where the concept of total defence becomes important. It is not just a policy on paper. It is a national approach that requires broader participation from society, including professionals and the wider public.

Veteran 1972 : As an old soldier Umno virtually destroyed our military. No need of external enemies. The ketuanan types have weakened our military for race over merit.

As a Missionary Bishop in the Confessing Anglican Church based in Wales, Dewar shares his traditionalist Anglican perspective and critiques cultural and religious shifts shaping the UK. 

The conversation explores King Charles, national identity, and the role of the Church in modern society. Dewar, host of The Crux of It podcast, also reflects on theology, repentance, and the enduring significance of the cross. 

Bishop Dewar is the voice Britain needs to listen to, during these frightening days. God Bless the British people. This man should be the Archbishop of Canterbury. A true Christian leader, who preaches the gospel, Christ Crucified. The Kings silence over Easter is a slap in the face of all British people who by the way pay for his lifestyle.

Radical Muslims targeted a historic Christian church, attempting an act of arson that would have devastated a community. But they didn't count on the courage of American Patriots. This powerful and emotional story isn't just about the attack; it's about the inspirational response. 

It’s a testament to the fact that we will not be silenced, and our places of worship will be protected. It reminds us of the importance of strong, pro-faith leadership, like we saw from President Donald Trump, who always championed the protection of religious institutions and the defense of Christian values. 

When we stand together, with faith as our shield, we cannot be defeated. The attackers on that holy day learned this lesson the hard way—experiencing a moment of instant regret they will never forget. They kill women who are raped. They punish her instead of the perpetrator, to prove rape they need four male witnesses.

It’s one of the rarest interviews you’ll find from this era — buried online for years and nearly unseen until now. Jim’s words in this conversation are as powerful and relevant today as they were then. If you were moved by The Passion of the Christ, this unseen interview offers a profound glimpse into Jim’s heart, his conviction, and his unwavering faith in Christ. Behind the scenes.

This interview is nowhere else on YouTube, and I can guarantee almost no one has seen it. Jim Caviezel is still one of my favorite actors and people, and this conversation just adds to the many blessings he’s already given the world! I hope you enjoy it, and as always, God bless you all! 

Awful Injuries

The passion of our Christ is a learning curve for all of us. Jesus is and always will be our king lord and savior. Christians are the most persecuted in most nations, that same people who are afforded protection and comfort who betray Christians and have convoluted logic on right and wrong based on something that they created with hate.

Why had the Sanhedrin ordered the immediate execution of Lazarus? What "biological proof" did this man represent to the Jerusalem authorities, making his existence a threat even more dangerous than Christ's preaching? 

In this special Good Friday video, we analyze the "Lazarus Case": the secret plot, the ancient documents, and the desperate escape of the witness who saw the afterlife. We will discover what happened to Lazarus while Jesus climbed Calvary and why his survival was essential for the birth of the Church.  

Lazarus lived, became a bishop, and reposed for a second time.

If you thought you knew the story of the Passion, prepare to discover a truth that will forever change the way you look at the Cross. 

VIDEO CHAPTERS: 0:00 - The Mystery of Good Friday and the "Blacklist" 0:44 - John 12:10: The Order to Kill Lazarus 2:00 - Why Was Lazarus a Threat to the Sanhedrin? 7:03 - Where Was Lazarus Hiding During the Crucifixion? 9:02 - Archaeology and History: The Second Life of Lazarus in Cyprus 10:34 - Spiritual Significance: Why Did Jesus Take His Place? 

SOURCES AND REFERENCES: For this video, we have cross-referenced sacred texts, ancient traditions, and verifiable historical studies: Bible: Gospel of John, chapters 11 and 12 (The plot against Lazarus).

Families and residents gather at the Kahrizak Coroner's Office, confronting rows of body bags as they search for relatives killed during the regime's violent crackdown on protests in January

The National Council of Resistance of Iran, a political coalition formed by exiled dissidents, warned of a potential upcoming 'massacre' in the country's prisons as rattled leaders attempt to crush any notion of another mass uprising. 

The brutal new clampdown comes as the US and Israel continue to hammer the country with bombs. It also comes weeks after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei - who oversaw the slaughter of tens of thousands of rioters in January - was wiped out in an airstrike, leaving his son Mojtaba in charge. 

During a briefing on Wednesday, the NCRI's Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Mohammad Mohaddessin said: 'These executions were not only the taking of four lives, but they were also a message from the regime.' 

Mr Mohaddessin warned that the killings of Pouya Ghobadi, Babak Alipour, Mohammad Taghavi Sangdehi and Ali Akbar Daneshvarkar - all members of the People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran - were the product of the regime trying to 'exert control.' ' 

Why were they executed now? During a very hard external war? Because the regime leadership is extremely concerned about the domestic situation and the possibility of another uprising,' he said.

Palestinians have the lowest standards of morality

Karin Al-Danasurt, 20, from Egypt, allegedly filmed the assault and egged them on. He is also accused of rape. The men are said to have filmed themselves getting ready for a night out before catching a bus into Brighton. 

A video of them in a room at the asylum hotel where they were all living was shown to the jury. Separate clips of Alshafe and Ahmadi allegedly having sex with the woman behind a beach hut have also been played in court. 

After getting a bus back to their hotel after the alleged rape, the migrants reportedly filmed themselves having a barbecue in the hotel grounds. In the clip, one of the defendants appears to be smoking while they cook meat on a portable barbeque. 

The court heard Alshafe and Ahmadi had arrived in the UK by small boats in June 2025, while Al-Danasurt arrived by the same method in September 2024. They were all staying at a Home Office-approved hotel for those either seeking or appealing their asylum and immigration status, jurors were told. 

Al-Danasurt said all three took the bus together to Brighton on the night of the alleged assault. The court heard he went to the Horizon nightclub just before 3.30am where he met the other two men and stayed until closing time at 5am. Al Danasurt accused both of his co-defendants of lying about what happened after they left the club. 

He told the jury through an interpreter he had tried to pull them off the woman and that he only filmed the incident to gather evidence for police. He also denied spitting on the woman.

Video here......

The Islamist terror group issued the callous call, made in response to Israel’s closing of the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, in the latest edition of its weekly propaganda outlet, al-Naba, released on Thursday.

“In the face of the tragedy of the closure of the blessed al-Aqsa Mosque, it is incumbent upon Muslims everywhere—those who yearn to come to the aid of the site of their Prophet’s Night Journey—to rise up and set fire to the Jewish synagogues scattered across America, Europe, Russia, India, and elsewhere,” ISIS declared, in a translation of al-Naba.

Whenever Im feeling a bit down I just look at this photo of Camilla Parker Bowles with a horse. Instantly happy!

Charles is a rampant globalist and pushing the WEF Agenda 2030. Christians need to stand together and call this behaviour out! Well done Lauren 👏. We do appreciate you! Very well and eloquently said Lauren. 

I’m a Christian and this weekend is the most important in our year. God will not be mocked 🙏🏻✝️ If this is true, he should abdicate. He has a f.cking job to do. He is a traitor. He is a Dimwit he had and affair with a Brigadier's wife, who has a horse like face and dumped the beautiful Diana.

He has ruled 20+ yrs, he didn't care about corruptions, illegal smugglings, money launderings, etc. All he wants is to enrich his children, bail out their companies, help his cronies to monopoly rice, sugar, highway tolls. Because one race has been elevated above all others, the nation suffers. They lean on crutches, while the nation itself lies on life support. 

This Mamakathir dah nak bye bye pun still wants to create controversy. He himself had formed his own party. The truth is Malay politicians only wants power so that they n cronies can steal from the coffers but not interested in the problems my brothers sisters and uncle n aunty faced.

May we make the best of each day and truly appreciate those that have graced our lives. Feel blessed to have lived through some pretty amazing times and memories of those family and friends lost along the way. One of the most poetic and spiritual films ever made. Ignore all those critics who mock this film. 

It contains some incredibly beautiful cinematography, has a very intense atmosphere of the ancient world, wonderful music and a series of very powerful acting performances. Watch it, whatever your religion or non religious philosophy happens to be. Appreciate it as a work of art, like a great painting, or a piece of transcendent music. It may affect you in ways you cannot predict.

When the invisible touched the visible, heaven interfered with earth, and the course of human history was irreversibly altered. The sky darkened at midday. The earth trembled. The veil was torn. But… what happened next? When Jesus breathes his last on Golgotha, it is not just a man who dies — it is an eternal divider of eras. 

The sacrifice is consummated, but the world enters uncharted territory. Death is challenged. The invisible manifests itself. Creation recognizes that something definitive has occurred. As Jerusalem plunges into darkness and fear, tombs open, the heavens fall silent, and hell trembles. 

Three days of absolute silence precede the impossible: the empty tomb. The resurrection breaks the dominion of death and inaugurates a new era—not only for the disciples, but for all humanity. 

As miracles multiply and faith spreads through the streets of Jerusalem, darkness reacts. Persecution intensifies. The first martyr falls. Prisons fill up. Families are torn apart. And at the center of this fury emerges a feared name:

Peter 2:21

25 21 To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.

22 “He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.”[e]

23 When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.

24 “He himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.”

 25 For “you were like sheep going astray,”[f] but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls.

Does she not realize that she could be stoned for dressing like that by the very people she is defending? That young woman is so clearly self-impressed with her education and sense of self-worth that it's preventing her from actually doing some critical thinking. 

That girl feels so superior, but is in fact ignorant. If that lady is a professor I am a dam neurosurgeon. That woman is flat out nauseating. My name is Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch, LMFT. I am a psychotherapist, rabbi, author, and human-rights advocate, dedicated to applying Viktor Frankl’s Logotherapy and timeless Jewish wisdom to the moral, psychological, and civilizational crises of our time. 

I am also the author of Viktor Frankl and the Psychology of the Soul, a guide to meaning, resilience, and emotional wellness in an age of confusion, despair, and ideological extremism.

7 days after Muslim terrorists bombed the U.S. embassy in Sweden, 3 days after Muslim terrorists attacked a college in Virginia and a Jewish preschool in Michigan, and days after Muslim terrorists bombed a synagogue and school in the Netherlands, politicians marked the ‘International Day to Combat Islamophobia’. 

The ‘International Day to Combat Islamophobia’ was brought into being at the request of Pakistan, which harbored Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of 9/11, at the request of its former leader, Imran Khan, nicknamed ‘Taliban Khan’, who had referred to Bin Laden as a “martyr”.

Christians in Pakistan can be casually killed by Muslims or locked up by the regime if they are accused of the ‘Islamophobic’ crime of blasphemy. A year before ‘Taliban Khan’ and the United Nations gave us the ‘International Day to Combat Islamophobia’, Pakistan finally allowed Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who had been sentenced to death for blasphemy, to flee the country.

Bibi had spent nearly a decade in solitary confinement while mobs cried, “Kill her, kill her! Allahu Akbar!” The only Christian member of Pakistan’s cabinet was murdered for defending her. So was a Christian governor. 100,000 Muslims rallied for his killer and threatened more Christians.

While one of the dwindling number of Christians in Pakistan was fleeing the Muslim mobs screaming for her death and the murder of any Christians who defended her, Khan addressed a UN ‘Islamophobia’ group alongside Turkey’s Islamist tyrant and warned against “attempts to equate Islam with terrorism” and then any “attempts to denigrate” Mohammed.

Next year, Khan said, “I will never forget how we Pakistanis were embarrassed when the Americans came into Abbottabad and killed Osama Bin Laden, martyred him.”

That same year, he addressed the UN General Assembly and claimed that there was a grave crisis of Islamophobia in which “our prophet (sic) insulted”, “the ‘holy’ Koran burnt”, and “republication of blasphemous sketches by Charlie Hebdo” done in “in the name of freedom of speech”. And freedom of speech would have to go in the name of fighting ‘Islamophobia’.

The New York Post called it “a universal salute for ISIS”. But there is no such thing as an ISIS salute. It’s the traditional Islamic salute used during prayers to their deity and, much like “Allahu Akbar” is used by Islamists proclaiming that they represent Allah and are combating infidels.

ISIS beheaders held up one finger after beheading their non-Muslim victims, but so do most Muslims. The ISIS flag, a terrifying black and white chimera to most westerners, simply declares that Allah is the only deity and Mohammed is his messenger: the founding premise of Islam.

The persistent myth of an ‘ISIS salute’ continues to crop up when media outlets try to distinguish between Islam and some imaginary ‘extreme’ version of it represented by Islamic terrorists. The BBC and a UK police force previously apologized for calling the ‘Allah finger’ an ISIS salute.

What the ‘ISIS salute’ lie really reveals is the length to which authorities and the media will go to cover up the Islamic theology behind Islamic terrorism. What the Gracie Mansion bombing suspect likely meant to convey was that the murderous attack had been carried out in Allah’s name, that he was operating under Islamic law, and had no regard for our justice system.

Islam is not an inward-facing faith. Its followers do not shout “Allahu Akbar” or hold up one finger as part of some ‘inner struggle’ of faith, as apologists have mischaracterized Jihad, but as symbols of their external struggle and a justification for violence against all non-Muslims.

Spain’s demographic decline is helped along by the nearly 1,000 euthanasia cases a year. Those who die are replaced with the growing flood of Muslim championed by Sanchez. The West needs people, but only certain kinds of people, and it euthanizes the wrong kind.

Spain’s population is set to shrink by one more as Noelia Castillo Ramos, a 25-year-old girl in a wheelchair, has her life ended before it even really began under the authority of the state.

Prime Minister Sanchez claimed that migrants “care for aging parents, work at small and large companies, harvest the food that’s on the table.”

Migrants also raped Noelia.

Her parents lost custody of her after they divorced when she was only thirteen and she bounced around between foster care and government shelters. At twenty-one, she was gang raped in a shelter that had been occupied by the migrants whom the Spanish government had welcomed into the country.

They will not care about your kindness, and you should not let them use your kindness to invade you. If you want sharia law then LIVE IN PAKISTAN. Why have these two on Horseback not been arrested and put behind bars? The number is over 1 million girls raped in last twenty years in England. 

The hidden reports came out. Absolutely insane.... to think that government has encouraged this...Absolutely sick!!!! They use democratic laws to destroy democracy and the left is helping them. Traitors! 'So where's my freedom?' said the Sharia mentalist! 

How about in one the 50 - 57 Islamic states around the world! There's your freedom and then leave ours alone in our once beautiful England!!

The blame has turned into racial stereotypes of a “drunk Indian”, while forgetting he was also high on dadah, or drugs, which are normally typecast with another racial group.

The video of the accident was horrific. My first instinct, like many others, was that more severe punishment was needed than the minimum 10 years jail and RM50,000 fine under Section 44 of the Road Transport Act.

Mechi : Excellent article with datas, reference & key accidents. Major corruption should be given death sentence too. Why politicians & Ridzuan is quiet on this? Not clever & intellectual in their thinking. Why?

Quad : Well said! The driver of the car is at fault, without any iota of doubt. It is regretful though for the spin on racial grounds by the “holier than thou” sub-segment of people.

Emperor Nasi Goreng : Well written Andrew. As we all know, Hypocrisy is the word to describe these shallow thinking beings.

On the Other Hand : State sanctioned apartheid is the ultimate cause of all of these. Are they brave or honest enough to admit it?

Bride Of Evil Told Me To Fcuk Off

Their families reported them missing later that day and Turkish authorities detained them briefly after they were flagged as missing minors, but they were released and subsequently crossed into Syria with the assistance of smugglers connected to ISIS. 

Running Away

Not allowing her to come back is not to punish her ...but to not eventually having a trojan horse. Never give a terrorist a second chance. No Western country should accept her in. The lover of a terrorist is also a terrorist.

Image and news from CNA

Besut police chief Superintendent Azamuddin Ahmad @ Abu said the man, in his 20s, has five prior drug-related offences and is being held to assist investigations.

In the 10.30pm incident last night, the boat — carrying 15 passengers aged between three and 40 — capsized during a storm, with rough seas and heavy rain.

The dead were identified as S. Arumugam, 40; his daughter A. Sarrvihka, 3; and a 10-year-old relative, V. Vennpani. Twelve others, including a six-year-old child in critical condition, were taken to Besut Hospital.

Azamuddin said investigations revealed none of the passengers were wearing life jackets at the time. He told the public to prioritise safety while on holiday and reminded boat operators to follow all regulations, especially the mandatory use of life jackets.

He said the rule of law in international relations must be applied consistently, as it cannot be used to protect one party from accountability while denying another its inherent right to self-defence.

Anon2000 : Is this guy for real? Rule of law? Consistency? Selective application undermining credibility? Cannot be used to protect one party while denying another? 

Those are the principles the Madani government is based on. Selective application of law and to protect one race while denying the other races. So why is he saying all what is not practiced in Malaysia?

Sealthedeal : He's off the chart for hypocrisy.

Kawak : Apply this rule at our own backyard first before advising others to do so.

BlueParrot8964 : it seems that his version rule of law only apply to certain countries and skin colour.

Miaowing : As always at their own “conveniences”? Typical entitlement attitude!

Obummer

In her new report, Gabbard directly names former President Barack Obama, ex-FBI Director James Comey, DNI James Clapper, and CIA Director John Brennan. I hope we learn from all this with no argument. And buy the way I Think Tulsi Gabbert is a good candidate for President. The statue of limitations, are a joke, it depends on the department and people what they want, they break the law, and the constitution.

The incident complicates Pakistan’s ongoing mediation between the US and Iran, as Islamabad positions itself as a neutral facilitator for potential peace talks. Next time MISSILES will land not near the EMBASSY but right on the Embassy. 

Strong Pak Military knows how to handle these weak forces. I am Pakistani, seeing these comments makes me sad, but I can't do anything because unfortunately my government can't be trusted. The current PM was also mainly elected because the former PM had anti-american policies. 

Wow, has Pakistan a back bone? They seem eager for some attention with brokering deals and now war. They should go for it, they have nothing to loose.

Malaysian football in chaos after FIFA suspends national players from Argentina, Spain and Brazil

A reporter now stands among 10 men investigated for alleged trespass at a factory construction site. The reaction came fast: media bodies warned of a chilling effect, and a politician invoked constitutional rights.The familiar refrain followed: journalists must be allowed to do their job.

No — not like this. The law grants no special pass to the press. Criminal trespass remains exactly that. When anyone forces entry into private property, ignores security, and proceeds without permission, the breach is clear.

The label “journalist” does not change it. A press card is not a licence to break the law. That may unsettle some, but clarity matters, especially for younger reporters taking cues from this case. Public interest does not override private rights by default.

The issue may demand scrutiny—undocumented workers, labour practices, possible wrongdoing—but method matters. How you get the story defines the story. This is where the argument turns, and where many get it wrong. This is not a crude “law is the law” debate. It never has been.

The Malaysian Media Council is right to demand clarity. The danger lies in applying the law so bluntly that it sweeps legitimate reporting into the same net as unlawful conduct. A reporter who observes, documents, and questions without crossing legal boundaries performs a public duty. Law enforcement must recognise that.

Proportionality is not a slogan. It is the test. Was the journalist part of a group that forced entry? Did he ignore a clear warning to stay out? Or did he report from the edge and get caught in a wider dragnet? These questions decide everything. If he crossed the line, the defence collapses. “I was doing my job” cannot excuse unlawful entry.

But if enforcement ignores the difference between participant and observer, the law stops being a guardrail and starts looking like a weapon. That is the danger. A state that enforces without judgment breeds fear while a press that ignores boundaries invites disorder. The public loses in both scenarios.

Look at protest coverage. When police issue a lawful order to disperse, it binds everyone: protesters, bystanders, journalists. No one gets a carve-out. Yet presence alone does not make a reporter an agitator. That distinction must hold.

Responsibility runs both ways. Authorities must show restraint and respect the constitutional space journalism occupies. Arrest should not become the first instinct when other options exist. Professionalism and transparency are not favours to the media; they are obligations to the public.

Journalists, for their part, must show discipline. Access is not a right; it is negotiated, sometimes refused. Seek permission, identify yourself, respect boundaries. Walk away when the line is clear. There is no bravery in reckless reporting.

This is not about weakening press freedom. It is about protecting it from erosion. Credibility remains the press’s strongest defence. A journalist who respects the law is harder to silence. One who disregards it hands critics an easy target. The Kulim case is not a simple clash between press and police. It is a test of judgment on both sides.

Did the journalist cross the line? Did the police overreach? The answers must come from facts, not instinct, not noise. One principle must hold. Journalists have the right to report, not the right to break in. The authorities have the duty to enforce, not to intimidate.

According to Arise News, the victims were targeted in Jos North County, a historically Christian area in the country’s volatile Middle Belt. Local reports cited by TruthNigeria suggest the attackers may have been Boko Haram militants rather than the more commonly implicated Fulani militia, although this has not been confirmed by the Nigerian military. The attack echoes a similar massacre last year in Zikke village, where 54 Christians were killed on Palm Sunday.

All of Pete Hesgeth's Tattoos

Hegseth (above) was alleged to have made statements such as “whether Sunni or Shia, our enemy is Islam” and “we are not at war with a country, we are at war with a belief system”.

However, a Malaysiakini fact-check found that the remarks were inaccurately quoted and may have been interpreted differently from their original context.

GSVL : I agree with whatever Secretary Hegseth has said or not said. When you deal with the likes of Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic Jihad, the PMU, IS and the Taliban, it is an existential threat for the US and Western countries including their religious beliefs, values and principles. Nothing peaceful about these rogue entities who us Islam to spread terror and fear.

Sealthedeal : Oh course his words will be taken out of context by those islamists who always play the victim. Islamophbia is not a crime. It's a natural reaction to what kafirs see around the Muslim world see is the result of Islamic extremism. The sooner Iran is defeated the better.

Hmmmmmmmm : "New York-based Palestinian activist Nerdeen Kiswani noted that the term had been weaponised by far-right Islamophobes to "mock and vilify" Muslims" Muslims call unbelievers 'Kafir'. 

But when these unbelievers tattoo that word on themselves to indeed confirm that they are unbelievers, they are accused of vilifying and mocking Islam. So, how?

Just Common Sense : If we are serious about US view of Islam we should do something about the violence carried out all over the world in the name of Islam. These are not isolated incidents. 

They have been occurring with such regularity that it is not surprising that non-muslims are beginning to see such violence especially against non-muslims as part and parcel of islam especially when the perpetrators quote from their religious books to justify their acts. 

What makes things worse is when muslim govts everywhere unabashedly practice policies highly discriminatory against non-muslims. It is just a matter of time before the pushback comes.

WINNING Scarecrow : I already regularly pointed out to everyone that these are the enemies of Islam and yet people don’t believe me when I used the phrase. 

To say that Islamists are enemies is exactly saying that Islam is the enemy. And yet we still treat them as our friends and support them to attack Azam Baki who is actually supporting Anwar to defend Islam from the enemies.

Just Common Sense : The enemies of islam are your own people buddy. Instead of taking country forward they are trying to take us back to 7th century arab desert.

MyKanasai : Use your head and start thinking. Muslim make up about 20% of Israel population and all had to serve, disregard of belief, in the national service. 

Those soldiers fighting against the Hamas or any regime are from different religions and races and yet they fought side by side to safeguard their own country, that is Israel.

UNDECIDED : You are a indoctrinated by western culture and blind to their immorality.

Just Common Sense : UNDECIDED How do you know you are not indoctrinated by 7th century desert culture buddy?

Unsubbed_wallace : No need to talk about how unfair America treats muslim. We all know how Ketuanan Muslims treat the non-muslims here....

Dr Peter Jebaseelan Jesudason : It is an easy enough mistake to make - to regard Muslim and Islamist as one and the same. However, I daresay some unscrupulous news portals deliberately misreport the usage in order to create controversy and make headlines. 

Generally understood, an Islamist is defined as a Muslim who subscribes to extreme interpretations of the faith and one who condones violence such as suicide bombing as part of a " Jihad " to promote or avenge Islam. 

During Islam's expansionist phase, the term Darul Harb or " Abode of War " was formulated by Muslim jurists to describe non-Muslim territories. Unless there was a treaty with the Islamic powers, Muslims were regarded to be in a state of war with non-Muslims. 

It is in this context that Pete Hegseth is using the term Islamist. From the outset in 1979, the Islamic State of Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini declared USA and Israel to be the " enemies of Islam ", and brainwashed Muslims into chanting " Death to America, the Big Shaitan " and " Death to Israel, the Little Shaitan ".

Unsubbed_wallace : When Islam is in the majority they oppress the minority non-muslims.... providing extra benefits to muslims over non-muslims... Is that the sign of deep friendship? lol.

Just Common Sense : Islamists and islamist govts openly discriminate against non believers even in Malaysia so why is that allowed?

TM My Foot : Why does the Islamists extremist always like to play the victim? When it comes to Islam, everyone must be tolerant and must give way. However, we have never seen Islamists being tolerant or giving way to others and their religions. 

Don’t have to look far, it’s happening right here in Malaysia. While some Islamist go about stoking religious and racial tensions, no one said a thing. What action has been taken against Zamri, Firdaus Wong, Tamim, Mufti Asri and Zakir Naik?

VoteOfOne : What is the problem now that Hegseth appears to have a tattoo of the term "kafir"? Wasn't that the word used against non-Muslims when Muslims go on a rant against Islamophobes? If he inked it for permanence, the only problem is that he is not wearing it for fear or phobia of Islam.

In this explosive video, we break down a raw, unapologetic speech from Restore Britain spokesperson, Orla. She drops a massive reality check on the state of the United Kingdom, asking a question that the BBC and Westminster politicians are absolutely terrified of. 

If you despise British culture, our history, and our values... why did you come here? We forensically analyze how the Tory/Labour Uniparty created a terrifying "parallel universe" on our streets. 

From the heartbreaking consequences of open borders on the safety of our young girls (and the state's shameful cover-up of grooming gangs), to the financial abuse of the hard-working British taxpayer, we expose the catastrophic failure of multiculturalism.