There is no distortion of Islam...just the distortion of the reality of Islam and those who lie about it and try to cover it up. For example..."Islam is a religion of peace". This is exactly what David Wood and some others said many years ago. This is one of the reasons they hate us. 

Islam never abrogated the reasoning for slavery, it entrenched it but Christianity did and it was Western Christians and white people who did that and isn't it strange that despite doing that all you ever hear is how white people are responsible for the whole of slavery. It's like somehow by doing this we have taken the hatred of this world upon us for doing that.

During a Feb. 10 hearing titled “Sharia-Free America: Why Political Islam and Sharia Law Are Incompatible with the U.S. Constitution,” the U.S. House Subcommittee on the Constitution will examine evidence about the potential threat that Sharia poses to the basic freedoms underpinning our constitutional republic.

Sharia is derived from Islam’s most important foundational texts, the Quran and hadith (the canonical collections of the Muslim prophet Muhammad’s deeds and pronouncements), and their interpretation and codification by Islam’s greatest classical legists. 

Not merely holistic, in the general sense of all-encompassing, it is totalitarian, regulating everything from the ritual aspects of religion to personal hygiene to the governance of a Muslim-minority community or an Islamic state, bloc of states or global Islamic order.

At its core, it demonstrates the yawning gap between Western and Islamic conceptions of freedom, hurriyya in Arabic. Indeed, following Sharia slavishly throughout one’s life was paramount to hurriyya, whose essence was pronounced by the 11th-century Sufi scholar al-Qushayri as “the perfection of slavery to Allah, and [his] religious law.”

Clearly, Sharia-based governance is the most troubling contemporary aspect of this Muslim conception of organizing society, being an ancient antecedent of more familiar modern totalitarian systems.

The partition of British India in 1947 divided the subcontinent into India and Pakistan along religious lines, resulting in mass violence and the splitting of the Indus River Basin. India gained control of the headwaters of the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej), while Pakistan inherited most of the downstream flow of the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab), creating immediate disputes over water allocation.  

The Indus Waters Treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, in Karachi by Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistani President Ayub Khan, with World Bank President Eugene Black as a witness.

After nine years of negotiations following the partition, the treaty resolved the bitter water dispute by dividing the six main rivers of the Indus Basin. India received unrestricted use of the three eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej), while Pakistan was allocated the three western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab), securing roughly 80% of the total annual flow for Pakistan.

The agreement required Pakistan to build a vast replacement infrastructure system to compensate for losing control over the eastern rivers, which had long irrigated large parts of Punjab and Sindh. This included constructing link canals to transfer water from the western rivers eastward, storage reservoirs, and major dams. The World Bank provided substantial financial support and mediation, making the treaty one of the most expensive water-sharing deals in world history at the time.

A couple of years ago, in my book, A Heretic’s Manifesto, I envisioned a situation where Iran’s female warriors against theocracy might one day come to the West only to find themselves branded ‘Islamophobic’. In my dystopic foretelling, these valiant hijab-burners would be accused by the pious pricks of the woke of such blasphemous sins as ‘hijabophobia’ – a real word, meaning ‘hostility to the hijab’. They might look to the West for refuge and wind up not being celebrated but being shouted down, charged with the thoughtcrime of Islamophobia.

Well, now it’s happened. Iranian icon Masih Alinejad has been damned as an Islamophobe. One of the theocratic regime’s most dreaded heretics, for her fearless defence of secular values and women’s rights, Alinejad has been living in exile in the United States since 2014. 

And last week she was marked with that shaming slur of ‘phobe’. Her crime? Daring to diss the hijab. Her accuser? None other than Mehdi Hasan – motormouth hack, darling of America’s coastal bourgeoisie, and someone who will never suffer the indignity of being told what to wear by preening, arrogant men who think they can talk to God.

I don’t think I have ever been as much ‘team’ someone as I was Team Masih in her digital clash with Hasan. It kicked off on Thursday when Alinejad had the temerity to criticise New York’s sainted faux-Marxian mayor, Zohran Mamdani. 

His office put out a tweet celebrating World Hijab Day. This garment is a ‘powerful symbol of devotion and celebration of Muslim heritage’, it gushed. It’s also a powerful symbol of sexist suppression under the boot of theocracy, as anyone who can be arsed to watch the news from Iran will know. Alinejad wasn’t happy. She let rip.

‘Really? Right now?’, she tweeted in reply to City Hall’s clueless hijab-cheering. You fawn over this hair-shaming cloak while women in ‘my wounded country’ are being jailed, shot and killed for refusing [it]’, she thundered. 

She then mused on Mamdani’s yellow-bellied silence on the massacres in Iran. ‘Not a single word of sympathy from you’, she wrote. ‘No expression of solidarity.’ She wondered – searingly – what kind of supposed progressive is less interested in ‘standing with women’ than ‘standing with our jailers’.

It was a blistering pushback. And she’s dead right: there is something seriously off about the fact that as women in Iran risk their lives by casting off the hijab, we in the West bow down to that regressive covering. There are even World Hijab Day events in British schools, where non-Muslim girls are encouraged to put one on to see what life is like for a Muslim. As one observer quipped, how about encouraging Muslim girls to take theirs off so that they might taste that hair-flowing freedom their non-Muslim peers enjoy?

The videos show Democrats calling to stop illegal immigration, while Fitzgerald revealed that 90 members’ phone records were obtained, adding another layer of scrutiny. He also highlighted the Arctic Frost operation, which Bondi repeatedly refused to discuss, escalating tensions in the hearing. This should’ve been played as a Super Bowl commercial. Why is this not a commercial being played everywhere.

Indons captured by 3 RAR

Pendaratan ini kembali terbilang gagal. Tentara Indonesia langsung berhadapan dengan pasukan Malaysia dibantu Inggris. Perdana Menteri Malaysia Tunku Abdul Rahman sampai menyempatkan diri melihat tentara Indonesia yang tertangkap dan ditahan di Kantor Polisi Pontian.

"However strong you may feel, you may like or dislike, respect or disrespect others' beliefs, but the ground rules must be observed. "Therefore, I want to remind my friends you have been told to observe these rules and you must adhere to these principles, and you have no right whatsoever to take the law into your own hands," he said at a Chinese New Year dinner hosted by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia (ACCCIM) last night.

He stressed that only the authorities can take action against unauthorised temples.

Raja Chulan : The government must first of all address the root cause(s) of the non-Muslim places of worship being built without "proper" approvals. The reason is plain and simple- it is because the government authorities act unreasonably and don't give approvals. 

Can the government show us how many approvals were given for non-Muslim places of worship the last 10 years? Compare that with masjids and suraus being built. I ask the PM and the Madani government to be fair. 

Don't say something and do the opposite- hypocrite. When you want their votes, you are pleasant but then after ascending to power you betray them. To the non- Muslims, I have this advice- VOTE THEM OUT!!

AyuhMy : Temples that stood since precolonial days, and before even the land code came into effect are not illegal but simply not given their due legal titles. Were these omitted on purpose? 

Land stolen from the precolonial temple and another house of worship built on the same site will only make it illegal and tak suc!..! No good will come from it. These temple and pig farms issues have been purposely stirred up to make life uncomfortable for the NM's. 

They think they can prosper without the NM's but they should think hard again. Just the corruption within their own (from defence to sanitation) is bringing the nation down. When the investors leave and tourists stop coming, it will be too late, and malusia can join the likes of burma and bangla..

Veteran 1972 : He threw the rock now he tries to hide his guilty hands!

“Since January, the state government has halted the issuance of pig farming licences and has focused on clearing existing farm sites in Tanjong Sepat in line with the decree of His Royal Highness (Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah),” he said in a statement issued after chairing the state executive council meeting.

Amirudin said about 70 percent of pork requirements for the non-Muslim community are sourced through imports from other states. Following the executive council’s decision, the menteri besar said the entire local requirement will be fully imported.  

Benefits of Pork

MarioT : DAP holds 15 seats in the Selangor state assembly compared to 12 seats held by PKR. It should consider moving out of PH and join with PN to replace the state government for its inconsiderate and discriminatory decision to ban pig farming in the state. Do not be led by the nose.

On the Other Hand : As usual, Anthony Loke and the DAP are hiding in a hole, not wanting to be noticed. Counting their Ministerial salaries and pensions?

Asam Pedas : Illegal Malay businesses by the hundreds of thousands operated all over Selangor. However legitimate tax paying business by non-Malays are forced to shutdown. So easy and no one raises a hand. Respect is a one way street along with tolerance? Shameful!!

GSVL : So the 44% non-Malays/Muslims in Selangor have no rights? Why not also ban cow and goat farming because they also pollute the environment, is unclean and emit foul smells? These is a serious erosion of non-Muslim rights in the face of Muslim fundamentalist extremism. 

The Sultan should not have issued such a decree. You mean there is not a single non-Malay/Muslim majority area in one of the 9 districts in the state where small scale, clean, modern and environmentally sound pig farming could be carried out? 

What is going to happen to the livelihoods of the 69 licensed pig farm owners in Selangor who still have around 100,000 pigs? Who is going to compensate them? Let us assume that 100% of the pork is going to be imported into the state, are the Muslims then going to object as to how and where the pork is going to be sold and consumed by non-Muslims? 

Is the Sultan then going to issue another decree to restrict the sale and consumption of pork in Malay/Muslim majority areas? This is a slippery slope. What is the legality of a royal decree? A constitutional ruler has no executive power to make policy decisions to the exclusion of the state exco and the state government.

Veteran 1972 : Make sure PKR and DAP suffer massive losses in the next elections. Cutting off a source of livelihood for the destitute and the poor.

Just a Malaysian : Pig is the most efficient animal converting leftovers or anything into meat. As compare to Cows or sheep that needs vast land and plentiful of grass to convert into meat. 

But pig rearing is dirty and smelly and that should be a challenge to agro industry to modernise pig farming like Taiwan and China. Government should lead in initiating this drive. But like all things non Muslim...don't like just ban. 

Pork is already very expensive and this move will add more burden to the non Muslim citizens. Its sad..our Tuanku who declares as ruler of all citizens did not take time to explore other options.

Open minded 2281 : The end of PH and DAP in Selangor. First PMX directed local councils to clear Hindu temples which existed prior to independence and local councils refusing to award land titles due to unknown reasons and secondly the closure of pig farms which also existed for a long time. The NM have been lied and cheated by politicians.

I can't understand this. The very people that destroyed NY during 9/11 put someone like them in office. Put a MUSLIM IN POWER AT YOUR PERIL. Prime example, LONDONISTAN. How could the New Yorkers vote for a man like this! 

All the leftists, wokes and communists are there, to form the nucleus for the destruction of the Western Civilization. It turns my stomach- my parents (father in WWII), are turning in their graves... Wow, is this mind blowing! As a boomer, it's horrifying to realize how close we have come to loosing constitutional America.

Even in countries such as India and China, he said, places of worship may only be built on legally approved sites. That comparison was deliberate: it signalled that Malaysia’s position does not stand outside regional norms. The rule that sacred space must comply with land and planning law is not unusual. 

It is standard practice across countries that take governance seriously. But the way different countries manage this tension between faith and regulation offers important lessons. India presents one path, China presents another. Neither offers a blueprint, both offer warnings.

India: law as shield — and battleground

India enacted the Places of Worship Act in 1991 to freeze the religious character of places of worship as they stood at independence. The aim was to prevent historical grievances from spilling endlessly into modern disputes. The law sought to draw a legal line and protect public order. That move showed foresight. It recognised that unresolved religious claims can destabilise a plural society.

Yet India also shows how disputes can shift into the courts and into politics. Even with legal safeguards, contested sites have triggered prolonged litigation and street mobilisation. Local politics often shapes enforcement. Court decisions sometimes settle matters, but not always public sentiment. The lesson here is not that law fails. It is that law must operate within trusted institutions.

When people believe enforcement bends to political pressure, even sound legislation struggles. India also reminds us of the importance of heritage protection. Many sites carry historical and cultural meaning beyond their religious function. Preserving them strengthens national identity. Ignoring that dimension fuels resentment. Malaysia can draw from this experience. Clear legal status matters, so does credible administration.

China: order through control

China approaches the issue differently. It requires strict registration of religious organisations and tightly regulates construction. Unauthorised structures rarely survive long. The country exercises firm oversight over land use and religious activity. This approach produces visible order. It reduces ambiguity and sends a strong signal that no religious activity falls outside regulatory frameworks.

But the cost is equally visible. Heavy control narrows religious space and places significant authority in state hands. Communities comply, but not always with confidence. Malaysia is not China. Nor should it seek that model. Order achieved through rigid control may prevent disorder, but it can also suppress trust. Still, China illustrates one reality clearly: governments that enforce land law consistently avoid the perception that sacred status overrides civic rules.

Malaysia’s middle path

Malaysia stands between these two approaches. It does not freeze history in law as India attempted. It does not centralise religious administration as China does. Instead, it operates within a constitutional framework that recognises Islam as the religion of the Federation while protecting the rights of other faiths.

That balance requires discipline. Anwar’s warning about unchecked structures addresses a genuine concern. When informal sites multiply without approval, authorities lose oversight. Landowners lose clarity, and communities lose predictability. But enforcement must reflect Malaysia’s character.

This country thrives on negotiation, documentation and local engagement. It resolves disputes through committees, not commands. That tradition is a strength, not a weakness. Malaysia can succeed if it pairs firm standards with transparent process. First, the federal government should define compliance criteria clearly and publish them.

When communities understand the benchmarks — land title, safety standards, planning approval — they can respond accordingly. Second, authorities should handle long-standing cases differently from new violations. History does not excuse illegality, but it does shape context. A shrine that stood quietly for 100 years requires careful handling, not abrupt removal.

Third, heritage assessment must play a central role. Some temples represent the journeys of plantation workers, traders and migrants who built modern Malaysia. Demolishing such sites without review erases part of the national story. Fourth, councils must apply standards consistently. A temple in one district cannot face harsher action than a similar structure elsewhere. Uneven enforcement breeds suspicion. None of this weakens the rule of law. It strengthens it.

Why regional comparisons matter

By referencing India and China, Anwar reframed the debate. He reminded Malaysians that regulated worship is normal. Sacred space does not sit outside civic order anywhere in Asia. The comparison also tempers emotional reaction. It shows that requiring legal approval is not hostility toward faith. It is governance. But comparisons also warn us against extremes.

India demonstrates how unresolved disputes can become political flashpoints. China demonstrates how excessive control can narrow space for trust. Malaysia must avoid both traps. It must enforce the law without theatrical displays. It must regularise where possible. It must relocate only when necessary, and it must always communicate decisions clearly. The aim is not to win an argument but to preserve harmony while restoring order.

A moment for measured leadership

Religious issues test the maturity of a nation. They stir memory and identity, they invite opportunists to inflame sentiment, and they tempt governments to act quickly for the sake of optics. Measured leadership resists that temptation. If Putrajaya sets clear national standards and insists on consistent application, it will stabilise the issue.

If councils document decisions and explain them publicly, suspicion will fade. India and China show that regulation is normal. They also show that trust determines whether regulation succeeds. Malaysia’s strength lies in its plural society and its constitutional framework. That framework already contains the answer: rights exist within law; law exists to protect rights.

Firm standards, careful execution and equal treatment. That is the middle path.

In this video, I break down: 

• The footage everyone is calling “Australia’s Rodney King moment”

• The claims of police brutality vs what actually happened

• The biting incident and why context matters

• The role of Green politicians and performative outrage

• The protests surrounding President Isaac Herzog’s visit

• The broader rise of Islamist activism in Australia

• Why public support for law enforcement matters

• And why hard-right parties are surging in the polls

Are police supposed to maintain order, or step back when faced with aggression? Are we witnessing necessary enforcement of the law — or political theater designed to shame officers for doing their jobs?

I also compare how different Western police forces respond to disruptive protests — including examples from Germany and the ACT — and ask whether Australia is finally drawing a line. This isn’t about silencing peaceful protest. It’s about whether intimidation, aggression, and open hostility towards the state should be tolerated in the name of “activism”.

Ken Paxton, attorney general for the state of Texas, at AmericaFest 2025 in Phoenix, Ariz., on Dec. 20, 2025.

Ken Paxton, the attorney general in Texas, has launched a series of high-profile legal actions targeting alleged terrorist-linked organizations as part of his efforts to combat domestic and foreign extremism in the state.

On Feb. 5, he announced a lawsuit against the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) “to stop the terrorist groups from operating in Texas.”

According to the 32-page filing submitted to a Collin County district court, the State of Texas alleges that the Muslim Brotherhood “is a radical terrorist organization that exists to usurp governmental power and establish dominion through Sharia law” and that it has “covertly operated in the United States under the name ‘CAIR’ for decades.”

The document states that “the group is not peaceful. It is not tolerant. It does not respect the freedom to practice other religions or sects, including Christianity and Judaism.”

Paxton is seeking temporary and permanent injunctions to halt all operations, fundraising, property ownership and recruitment by the organizations in Texas.

The attorney general also turned his attention to domestic terror groups. On Feb. 6, Paxton initiated legal action against the Houston-based Screwston Anti-Fascist Committee, described by his office as an “Antifa-affiliated unincorporated nonprofit association,” alleging violations of Texas law tied to doxing and violence.

“Radical leftists have engaged in coordinated efforts to militantly attack our nation and undermine the rule of law,” he said. “These deranged traitors will face the full force of law. No stone will be left unturned, and no tool will be left unused.”

Paxton noted that Antifa has been designated by U.S. President Donald Trump as a terrorist organization and that “reported members of Screwston affiliates recently participated in an armed assault on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Alvarado, Texas.”

As such, he is opening an investigation into the group and has issued a “legal demand for records and documents that will be used to identify the scope of legal violations committed by the organization.”

Those Christians who attempt to practice their faith more or less openly do so with the awareness that they could attract the attention of the authorities at any time, and so they have to proceed with extreme caution, a caution that is utterly foreign to Christians in the West — but might not be for much longer.   

Orthodox Times on Thursday published an illuminating account of life in the tiny Greek Orthodox community in Tehran, which, we’re informed, “gathers at the only Orthodox church in the entire country, the Church of the Annunciation.” 

It doesn’t, however, gather very often. Archimandrite Nikiforos Kounalis of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Crete has gone to Tehran three times to provide the faithful of the Church of the Annunciation with a parish priest, always for a brief period. Otherwise, there is no parish priest at the Church of the Annunciation, and most of the time, the church isn’t even open — because Iran’s Islamic authorities frown on its being open at all. 

Fr. Nikiforos recounts: “I always went there during Holy Week, because that was the only time the church was open.” The other 51 weeks of the year, the Church of the Annunciation sits closed in Tehran, a silent witness to how difficult the Islamic Republic makes life for Christians.

Not out of sentimentality, but because they represent the civilisational pillars of the West. Australia is my home. Britain is our cultural ancestor. America is the muscle that keeps the whole thing standing. What I expose here is far more serious than culture wars or partisan squabbles. 

Newly released documents show how the European Union has been pressuring American tech companies since at least 2015 to censor legal political speech. Populist views. Anti-migration arguments. Criticism of elites. Satire. Anything that challenges their agenda. 

This censorship doesn’t stop at Europe’s borders. It affects Australians, Americans, Britons, Canadians. Anyone using platforms owned by U.S. companies. That’s why leaders across Europe are now openly targeting Elon Musk. 

X is the only major platform that refused to comply. Raids, investigations, threats of criminal liability for CEOs are not accidents. They are intimidation. Say the wrong thing about mass migration. Say the wrong thing about citizenship giveaways. Say the wrong thing about ideology. 

And suddenly it’s “hate speech”. This is why America matters. This is why free speech still matters there. And this is why the warning from Ronald Reagan feels more relevant than ever. We are no longer one generation away from losing our freedom.

Genocide Criminals No space In Australia Deport them, Criminals nation wide! Waste of time and energy. That will never change Israeli policy of holding onto its ancestral land. No protest against brutal Iranian regime but Israel, Hypocracy! This is what you get when you vote for the greens the most disgusting political party in Australian history. 

Ex-AG's daughter pans NSW premier over 'carnage' at protest vs Israeli rep

World Citizen : Hannah, you are a disgrace to your father. You and you gang showed no outrage on the Bondi Beach massacre nor did you offer prayers for the victims. The Australian Government should cancel your citizenship and deport you back to Malaysia. 

Then you will understand what freedom means and how it is to live under a Muslim hegemonic country. You need to know or just talk to your father on the recent incidents of how the majority here is victimising the minorities on the temples and the pig farms issues. 

These are just the samplings of the injustices done to minorities. You are sitting there in a white man's country who treats you with respect and fairness but you are asking the Premier of NSW to resign. How dare you and what gall of you! Are these the values your father taught you?

ScarletViper9930 : Religious rallies of this kind should not be allowed because we know how religion can give rise to extremism and violence. Police did right to clamp down on these people.Hannah Thomas should go live in Palestine instead of abusing the country which host her.

Sherlock : This woman has lost her moral compass. Without Palestinian issue, she would have been championing tree hugging. Issues with no solution in sight, so that it remains perpetual. And be noticed.

Sealthedeal : It's a global phenomenon. People are fed up with Muslims protesting on foreign soil over the Palestinian situation when they started it and in Australia the recent mass shooting by an IS inspired Muslim. 

If Muslims feel that strongly go to Palestine but do not cause trouble in more enlightened countries even if you are citizens of that country. Non Muslims have had enough.

Vijay47 : Ms Hannah, you describe police action against demonstrators protesting the visit to Australia by the Israeli President as "a carnage". Fair enough. 

That is your view, a stand that I and many others in Malaysia do not share. But I don't recall you having expressed any outrage against the Bondi Beach carnage. Jewish lives don't matter?

BlackDove Type C : Concurred, Hannah Thomas should return to Malaysia. Look no further, Orang asli Jakun is being driven out from their adat land in Pahang like Palestinians in Gaza at this moment, why don't you ask her to look into it? 

Malaysians are going to be proud of you. Of course, this is due to peaceful Orang Asli did not fight like Hamas by kidnapped, raped and murdered on Oct 7. 

If the Orang Asli is very safe here and are free to live in the vast jungle in Malaysia on their adat lands, then how come 21 Orang Asli villagers detained for alleged trespassing in Pahang? 

Talking about temples, these temples existed since colonial times, subsequently, other people go to buy the land then start the eviction.

Officers used pepper spray after protesters attempted to enter restricted areas. Herzog’s trip includes memorial events following the December 2025 Hanukkah shooting at Bondi Beach that killed 15 people. He met Jewish community members and called for unity against violence. 

Pro-Palestinian groups criticised the visit over the war in Gaza, while others welcomed his presence. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese urged peaceful protest as authorities tightened security and expanded police powers during the visit.

It was a public display of dominance, intimidation, and political messaging. And this time, the authorities said: not happening. We look at: Why public “prayer protests” are never random or benign. 

How religious demonstrations are deliberately staged at landmarks and civic spaces. The double standard Western governments apply out of fear of backlash. Why this incident triggered a full meltdown among Islamist and far-left activists. 

How propaganda spreads instantly once police actually enforce the law I also respond to media outrage, activist disinformation, and a viral clip involving Israeli President Isaac Herzog during his visit to Australia, including why the comparison being pushed is dishonest and manipulative. 

This video includes: Footage from Sydney protests Police crowd control in action Media spin vs what actually happened Comparisons with similar incidents in the UK, Europe, and India. This wasn’t about silencing anyone’s beliefs. It was about law and order, public space, and a country finally refusing to be bullied. Well done, Australia. Well done, NSW Police.

After nearly twenty years of legal battles, the court declared the state was "not vicariously liable" for the actions of its officers—forcing the victim's family to return the damages they had previously won. 

This video breaks down how a murder that shook the world ended not with acknowledgment, but with a balance sheet. 

[DISCLAIMER] This video is a critical analysis of the 2026 Court of Appeal ruling. All content is based on court records, publicly reported material, and fair comment on a matter of public interest. 

THE 2026 RULING EXPLAINED: In 2022, the High Court awarded Altantuya’s family RM5 million in damages. In 2026, the Court of Appeal overturned that decision regarding the government. 

The Ruling: The court held that Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar were acting acting outside their official duties (on a "private frolic") when they killed Altantuya. The Result: The Government of Malaysia was found not vicariously liable. 

The Consequence: The damages paid by the government were returned in full, including interest. KEY FIGURES: Altantuya Shaariibuu: The victim at the center of Malaysia’s most haunting case. 

Dr. Shaariibuu Setev: Her father, who fought a 20-year legal battle and was forced to return the damages in 2026. Sirul Azhar Umar & Azilah Hadri: Former UTK officers convicted of the murder.

Bad bunny is a foul mouth. Nothing about him is family friendly. His lyrics are a disgrace. Harris did absolutely nothing in four years as VP. Why would we expect anything different as president. I'm sick and tired of the left being able to openly lie with zero consequences. The Left gets away with lying everyday, all day.  

They are absolutely despicable people. Hearing Kameltoe say “Trump has done nothing” is hilarious coming from someone that sat on their hands the entire time as vice president- and remember, lied directly to Americans saying Brandon was “sharp as a tack” lol you can’t even make this stuff up.

Featuring insights from Raymond Ibrahim, Lord Pearson's powerful House of Lords speech, and biblical contrasts with Judaism's obsession with life vs. troubling Quranic teachings. From 100+ verses calling for violence, Sharia already operating in the UK, rising demographics (4M+ Muslims), random attacks dismissed as "mental issues," to the myth of "religion of peace" meaning submission—we expose the existential threat. Not every Muslim is the issue, but the teachings are.

Yalova’s quiet coastal calm masked a decade-long Islamic State presence enabled by legal impunity and permissive security policy

Far from being an accidental security failure, the group’s long-term presence appears to have been sustained by a permissive environment shaped by Turkey’s intelligence services, which treated jihadist networks as manageable assets rather than existential threats and, at times, leveraged their violence to advance the political objectives of the Islamist ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), both domestically and in Turkey’s immediate neighborhood.

 Islamic State’s long-term presence appears to have been sustained by a permissive environment shaped by Turkey’s intelligence services.

That calculation collapsed violently in December 2025, when a police operation against a known ISIS cell in Yalova spiraled into a deadly confrontation. Three police officers were killed along with six ISIS militants, exposing the limits of Ankara’s ability to “manage” radical groups it had long tolerated and in some cases shielded and sponsored. The episode underscored how jihadist operatives, emboldened by years of legal impunity and political protection, ultimately demanded more than the Turkish state, even under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Islamist government, could or would deliver.

Although the ISIS safe house and the militants holed up inside had long been known to Turkish authorities, the government dispatched a local police unit at around 2 a.m. to execute a search warrant without adequate equipment. Officers reportedly lacked body armor, night-vision goggles and armored personnel carriers. Special forces, normally deployed in high-risk counterterrorism operations before regular police execute warrants, were not called in.

The decision suggests that authorities did not anticipate armed resistance and that intelligence assessments failed to warn of a likely deadly confrontation. When police arrived at the house, ISIS militants immediately opened fire, pinning officers down in exposed positions, killing three and wounding others. Forensic examinations later revealed traces of gunpowder on some of the wives of the slain ISIS militants, suggesting that women may also have taken part in the firefight.

When she married political consultant Tim Mynett in 2020, public whispers followed her about an affair while he remained married to Beth Mynett. Before they were wed, Mynett converted to Islam, a faith that draws a firm moral line against alcohol. 

Soon afterwards, pictures and accounts of Mynett surfaced, showing him hauling liquor into Omar's Washington home and smoking cigarettes, bad behavior for a recently converted man.

BAUCHI, Nigeria, Feb 4 (Reuters) - Nearly 200 people have been killed by armed men in separate attacks in remote villages in central and northern Nigeria, a local lawmaker, residents and police said on Wednesday, as security forces searched for survivors and chased the attackers. In central Kwara state, gunmen attacked Woro community on Tuesday leaving at least 170 people dead, the lawmaker for the area, Saidu Baba Ahmed, said by phone. 

It was the deadliest assault recorded this year in the district bordering Niger state, an area increasingly targeted by gunmen who raid villages, kidnap residents and loot livestock.  Ahmed said the gunmen rounded up residents, bound their hands behind their backs and executed them. The lawmaker shared photographs of dead bodies with Reuters, which the agency was not immediately able to verify. 

Villagers fled into surrounding bushland during the attack, he said. The gunmen torched homes and shops. Police said "scores were killed", without giving a figure.

As Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrives in Malaysia for what's being framed as a new chapter in India-Malaysia relations, one name hangs over the entire visit like an unspoken accusation: Zakir Naik. The controversial preacher has been living comfortably in Malaysia for years, despite India's repeated extradition requests dating back eight years for charges including money laundering and inciting religious discord.

And just to add insult to injury, a rally organized by one of Zakir's own students is happening right when Modi touches down, supposedly about temple demolitions but possibly serving a much more pointed political purpose. This isn't just about one fugitive.

It's about what Malaysia's continued protection of Zakir Naik reveals about the actual state of these so-called friendly relations. We're talking about a government that controls both police and military yet claims it can't act out of fear of protests and religious backlash.

We're talking about a country that happily accepts India's palm oil purchases and economic collaboration while its media ecosystem pushes anti-India sentiment and its religious leaders defend a man wanted by Indian law enforcement. The contradiction is staggering, and it raises a fundamental question: can you really have a genuine diplomatic breakthrough when one country refuses to address what the other sees as a basic matter of justice and respect?

The resolution to this problem is remarkably simple if there's actual political will behind it. Cooperate with Indian intelligence, interrogate the relevant parties, and let Zakir Naik face the legal system in his home country. But Malaysia has chosen a different path, one paved with what can only be described as cowardice dressed up in humanitarian language that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

If this basic issue can't be resolved during Modi's visit, then all the talk about new chapters and strengthened partnerships is just another round of diplomatic theatre.

From Australia’s response to the Bondi terror attack to pressure campaigns against former Prime Minister Scott Morrison and current Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, this video breaks down how the conversation around Islam, extremism, and political power is being deliberately reshaped.

We look at:

Why terms like radical and extremist Islam were originally created to protect Islam and Muslims

The backlash against Scott Morrison for calling out political Islam

How hate speech laws are being weaponised to silence criticism

Senator Randy Fine’s explosive remarks in the United States and the death threats that followed

Europe’s accelerating collapse under mass migration and demographic engineering

Spain’s decision to legalise half a million illegal migrants

The criminalisation of “Islamophobia” in Virginia and what it means for free speech in America

Why Western civilisation matters, why it’s under attack, and why America is now the last line of defence

This is not about race. It’s not about religion versus religion. It’s about civilisation, values, freedom, and whether the West has the will to survive its own moral confusion.

‘Anti-Muslim hostility’ definition unlawful

The proposed government definition of ‘Islamophobia’, now re-worded as ‘Anti-Muslim hostility’, was leaked in December. I commented about it at the time, but more opposition to this newly proposed definition has now emerged.

Earlier this month, a new report from the Counter Extremism Group argued that the proposed definition is ‘unlawful’. The report argues that members of all faith groups have legal protection from discrimination or incitement. The point is that these protections apply to all equally. They protect the right to proselytise and practise a religion as well as the right for that same religion and its practices to be criticised without fear.

What the proposed definition of anti-Muslim hostility does is it goes beyond the law in giving Islam and Muslims special protection. In doing so it could constitute “unlawful discrimination towards members of other faith groups.”

The report notes that other minority faith groups, such as Hindus, Sikhs, and Christians, as well as Muslim groups regarded as unorthodox such as Ahmadis or Alevis, will perceive the adoption of an official definition of anti-Muslim hostility as “evidence of favouritism” towards Muslims or self-appointed Muslim community leaders. This will only serve to increase inter-communal tensions, rather than reduce them.

Evidence shows, that religiously aggravated hate crime is far more of a problem for the UK’s Jewish community than for Muslims. Anti-Muslim hate crime is wholly unacceptable, but rates are not increasing relative to the size of the Muslim population.

---

Hindus opposed

Late last year, the Hindu Council UK published a letter to Steve Reed MP, Minister for Communities, objecting to the proposed definition. The letter warns of “vague and undefined concepts” in the definition such as “prejudicial stereotyping”. It also complains that the definition conflates people with beliefs and ideas: