It is inconceivable that such abuse could occur in the name of religion. Over 400 children were rescued
from homes allegedly run by GISBH, many of them bearing physical and
emotional scars from severe neglect, physical abuse and even sexual
violence.
This
scandal raises urgent questions: how could these atrocities happen
under the guise of Islam, and how did we, as a society, allow this to
flourish?
The
roots of these concerns lie in GISBH's historical ties to the Al-Arqam
movement, which was banned by Malaysia’s National Fatwa Council in 1994.
Originally
operating as Rufaqa Corp, this rebranded entity has transformed into a
significant private conglomerate with 25 subsidiaries and assets worth
RM325 million.
With over 5,000 employees across 20 countries,
including notable holdings in major cities, its expansive growth raises
critical questions: How did the authorities allow a group with such a
controversial past to flourish with nothing more than a name change?
Despite
being officially banned, al-Arqam's legacy persists through GISBH,
which has expanded its reach and influence globally. How has this
organisation managed to operate, with a simple name change, without
oversight from local religious authorities?
Recent revelations
surrounding the delay in addressing abuses within welfare homes linked
to GISBH highlights a troubling pattern of inaction by government
agencies.
This delay highlights systemic failures across key enforcement bodies, raising critical questions about accountability.
Why
were the welfare homes allowed to operate for so long despite clear
warnings? The inaction exposes gaps in coordination and execution that
result in serious harm to vulnerable populations.
And what
mechanisms have enabled this controversial group not only to survive but
to prosper in Malaysia? The answer is simple. They have used Islam as a
cover to continue their abuses and misguided religious practices.
In
a society where questioning anything that appears even remotely Islamic
is frowned upon, many choose to turn a blind eye, relying on blind
faith instead.
Unseen victims
Amidst the
chaos, one crucial point has been overlooked: the abuse and
indoctrination of women and children, blatantly carried out for at least
two generations. Religious authorities, while actively punishing
personal sins, allowed these horrific atrocities to unfold and remained
silent for five years - why?
In the end, the Islamic image
portrayed by GISBH was used to blind their sharp eyes, typically focused
on enforcing punitive measures for individual transgressions.
GISBH,
perceived as an Islamic organisation, certainly benefited from this,
enabling it to hide the horrific internal abuse inflicted on its
members, especially women and children.
It is deeply troubling that such practices were allowed to occur, largely because religion in Malaysia remains a taboo subject.
Had
these indoctrinated women been in an environment where open discussions
on religion were encouraged, they might have been able to make more
informed and empowered choices.
Patriarchy’s benefits to men
GISBH
reeks of patriarchy, where men reaped immense benefits. Despite lacking
the financial means, many had multiple wives and some even fathered up
to 20 children, completely ignoring their responsibility to provide for
their families, as mandated by Islamic law.
It's baffling to think how a man could care for 20 children, especially in a world where providing for even one is a challenge.
In
this environment, children suffered both physical and emotional abuse,
while women were enslaved, stripped of any understanding of their rights
- whether under Islamic or federal law.
People worked for the
organisation without pay, and only Allah knows what other conditions
they endured. What have these women and children gone through? We will
never fully grasp the extent of their suffering but can only imagine the
overwhelming pain and helplessness they must have felt.
There is a
clear reason why GISBH was allowed to thrive: as a nation, we are
afraid to have open and critical conversations about religion,
especially when parochial interpretations flourish from the mainstream
narrative set by the authorities, and by extension, the government.
This narrative is deeply rooted in patriarchy, emphasising male superiority and the expectation that women remain subservient.
Superficial Islam: Illusion of piety
In
Malaysia, there is an obsession with appearances. We have created a
version of Islam that prioritises how one looks and performs rituals
rather than how one embodies the values of the faith.
It’s an
illusion of piety, where the outward display of religious practice -
donning specific attire, praying without understanding, and following
rituals mechanically—has taken precedence over internalising the core
teachings of compassion, justice, and mercy.
Our
political leaders have exacerbated this issue, embracing a brand of
“political Islam” that focuses on image rather than substance.
They
encourage people to appear religious instead of fostering a deeper,
more meaningful understanding of what it means to be a Muslim. Wearing a
“serban” or attending a “sekolah pondok” does not automatically make
one an expert on Islam, yet we seem to elevate these figures without
question. This blind faith in appearances over knowledge has led us
astray.
Islam, a religion of wisdom and compassion, has been
reduced to mere rituals and dress codes, while intellectual engagement
and critical thought are sidelined.
In a nation where politicians
compete to “out-Islam” one another, the true beauty of our
multicultural, multi-religious society is lost.
Hypocrisy in leadership
We
must ask ourselves: are our Muslim leaders truly following the guidance
of Allah, or are they simply doing whatever it takes to secure votes?
Being
perceived as a “good Muslim” seems to carry political weight, but this
perception is often hollow. Many of our so-called “pious” leaders face
corruption charges or other scandals, revealing the hypocrisy of their
outward displays of faith.
Corruption runs rampant, with even high-ranking officials, such as immigration officers at KLIA, being arrested for illegal activities.
At
the same time, intellectual debate is stifled. Open, respectful
discourse on matters affecting the community, especially within
religious institutions, is actively discouraged.
Diverse
perspectives on Islamic jurisprudence are not welcomed, as our
authorities seem to favour a singular, narrow interpretation of Islam.
Spirit of Islam
At
its core, Islam is a religion of justice, mercy and wisdom. It calls
for intellectual engagement, continuous learning and compassion. Yet in
Malaysia, we have drifted far from these ideals.
Instead of
fostering a society that encourages understanding and respect for
diverse perspectives, we have allowed religious conservatism to
dominate, leaving little room for rational debate or intellectual
growth.
The tragic case of the children under GISBH’s care is a
painful reminder of what happens when we lose sight of the values of our
faith. The abuse they endured is not just a failure of one organisation
- it is a failure of our society.
It is time for our leaders,
both religious and political, to reflect on the teachings of Islam and
work to ensure that these principles - justice, compassion and humanity -
are upheld for all Malaysians.
The question remains: will we
continue to focus on superficial displays of religiosity, or will we
embrace the spirit of Islam and work toward a more just, compassionate
and inclusive Malaysia?
SISTERS IN ISLAM is an NGO working
towards advancing the rights of Muslim women in Malaysia within the
framework of Islam, universal human rights principles, constitutional
guarantees, as well as the lived realities and experiences of women.