Thiesen states: “In the New Right, we would vote no to grant Danish citizenship to people who come from countries based on Muslim values,” and she argues:

As long as the problems in foreign policy are not solved from the bottom up, you have to do something like this. It is simply purely practical. We can see that these groups are overrepresented in the crime statistics, and we do not want to grant them Danish citizenship.

This proposed ban will inevitably lead to predictable charges of “racism” from the mainstream media. The frequently heard charges of “racism” throughout the West almost always refer to “racism” against Muslims, not Hindus, Buddhists, or adherents of any other religion — and Islam is not a “race.” The rise of populist parties was in response to the ongoing crisis of the Islamization of the West, a point which should be obvious. 

But precisely because of the Islamic supremacist incursion into the West, even open discussions about the impact of Muslim migration is a non-starter. Such discussions are now judged as “Islamophobic” and have been driven underground and stifled in mainstream conversation. Meanwhile, Denmark’s Justice Minister admitted in June to the fact that the country has a “‘big problem’ with criminal migrants.”

Denmark, like other countries, has been besieged by Islamization problems in every sector, including the undermining of its culture. For example, the country has a “cherished cultural tradition” of singing  a communal morning song that children learn in schools, but now a proposal to include mention of Ramadan has been introduced. “Inclusion” should never mean the elimination of one’s own tradition.