If there was a moment when the United States could have productively intervened in Syria, it looks like that moment has passed. Shiite militants, including Hezbollah — partly at the
behest of their paymasters in Iran — are racing to the defense of Bashar
Assad’s regime. According to a witness account in the New York Times, there were some 11,000 Hezbollah fighters in the besieged town of Qusayr alone. A Shiite religious student in Najaf, Iraq, told the Times
that his colleagues believe the leader of Qatar, a backer of Sunni
Syrian rebels, is a long-prophesied demonic figure who, it is foretold,
will raise an army in Syria to wipe out Shiites in Iraq. As a result,
devout Shiites are racing to defend their faith.
Sunnis around the world, meanwhile, are being called on
to join the conflict, with the material support of Saudi Arabia and
Qatar. The Sunni Muslim Scholars Association of Lebanon issued a fatwa
calling on followers to support the rebels “by words, money, medical
aid, and fighting.” The hugely influential Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, a Sunni
Egyptian cleric based in Qatar, called on Sunnis everywhere to come to
Qusayr’s aid and proclaimed Hezbollah “more infidel than Jews and
Christians.”
In the Middle East, them’s fighting words. It’s tempting to compare what is going on in Syria to
the Spanish Civil War, a conflict that presaged World War II in many
ways, chief among them the way fascists and Communists used the
belligerents as proxies for the larger conflict brewing in Europe. The Assad regime, essentially a puppet of Shiite Iran,
is a devil we know well. However much the rebellion began as a
nonsectarian protest against Assad’s corruption, it is now rapidly
becoming dominated by al-Qaeda and other radical and terrorist forces.
One such rebel group has reportedly been involved in the slaughter of
Christians — not the kind of crowd many Americans have an interest in
supporting.
But beyond the bad guys–versus–bad guys aspect, the
Spanish Civil War analogy has its limits. A better comparison may be to
the bloody upheavals that tore apart Europe in the wake of the
Protestant Reformation. Christianity benefits from dogmas and doctrines more
conducive to the separation of church and state than those found in
Islam, starting with Jesus’ injunction to render unto Caesar what is
Caesar’s. When the Roman Empire fell, the seat of political authority
transferred to Constantinople, but the religious authority remained in
Rome. This created room, conceptually at least, to distinguish political
authority from religious authority. But the divine right of kings
rendered that distinction operationally moot for centuries.
It wasn’t until the bloody religious wars between
Catholics and Protestants — as well as different denominations of
Protestantism — had exhausted much of the continent that Europeans came
to recognize “the essential futility of putting the beliefs of the mind
to the judgment of the sword,” in the words of historian C. V. Wedgwood.
In short, the tradition of religious tolerance we take for granted today was paid for with generations of bloodshed. Several centuries of war and religious persecution may
not seem all that heartening a precedent. But things move much, much
faster now. For instance, it took the West several millennia to learn
how to lift its people out of poverty. The rest of the world leapfrogged
countless intermediate steps by learning the West’s lessons.
Between 1981 and 2001, for example, China alone lifted
680 million people out of poverty when it accepted the basic wisdom of
markets. It came to that lesson only after it exhausted itself testing
the barbaric limits of Communism, killing tens of millions of its own
people trying to make an unworkable theory work. Edmund Burke was right when he said, “Example is the
school of mankind, and they will learn at no other.” What is happening
in the Middle East is a horror. But some lessons can only be learned
after exhausting the worse alternatives first.
There may yet be a role for America to minimize the
horror. But a lasting solution can only be found when the people on the
ground are ready and willing to take it to heart. National Review
|
