Rudyard Kipling"
“When you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldier”
General Douglas MacArthur"
“We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.”
“It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.” “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.
“The soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.”
“May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .” “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
“Nobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
“We never see other people anyway, only the monsters we make of them.” - Colson Whitehead, (Zone One)
COMMENT
In a speech to Malaysian students in Indonesia, Prime Minister Najib
Abdul Razak exhibited the usual thinking that afflicts most politicians
when he said,
“That’s why I ask, are people not able to think (that it’s illogical)?
It has turned out that some people cannot think wisely, even lawyers
can’t.” The
“usual thinking” I am referring to is the disingenuous, patronising and
divisive manner in which political partisans categorise issues and
people, demonising those who do not drink whatever kool aid is being
dispensed. Do not believe the lies and slander of the
opposition, says our prime minister, conveniently forgetting that his
party’s mouthpiece Utusan Malaysia (or at least its editor) is on record saying that it is the role of his paper to spin for the government. Alternatively, what about the New Straits Times and its unskillful editing of a foreign politician’s (simpatico to the opposition) parliamentary speech to make him look anti-Islam? I have no idea why some people cannot think “wisely”, but can you blame
them when it comes to the issues like the Royal Malaysian Police and
their standard operating procedures? In a 2006 article written by Farish A Noor for the Muslim Media News Service entitled ‘Whom does the Malaysian police force serve’,
when the whole issue of the Independent Police Complaints and
Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) was reaching boiling point, Farish
highlighted this interesting fact: “This all came to a head
when a routine blunder led to the posting of a police report (meant only
for internal circulation) on the Malaysian police website this week.
“The internal circular was meant to explain to the members of the
police force why they should collectively oppose the proposal to set up
an independent commission to look into the conduct of the police. “In a
telling giveaway sentence, the report noted that such a
commission would ‘cause a state of anarchy that would undermine the
ruling coalition’s power’ in the country.” Online mob mentality
Perhaps it is best that politicians leave the “thinking wisely” to
people who would hold them accountable. Of course, the punchline here is
that this would probably not happen because it is all about the party
not the candidate. In addition, what of the opposition? The
whole Lynas fiasco is a good example of the hysteria created using lies
and slander and an example of online mob mentality that is ammunition
for the perception of the existence the so-called Red Bean Army. Never mind the backtracking that happened of Wong Tack the very public face of the anti-Lynas movement, after he (officially)
joined the ranks of the opposition, the whole drama made a mockery of
the Green movement here in Malaysia. However, what I find
“irrational” is that a candidate like Zulkifli Noordin who contested in
Shah Alam, could garner 42 percent of the vote (apparently an
improvement from the previous candidate) all the while pushing an agenda
which is antithesis to the whole 1Malaysia concept.
Apparently, a healthy percentage of the population is not ready for
either the 1Malaysia or Bangsa Malaysia deal. Zulkifli whose preferred
method of discourse seems to be jailing anyone
who disagrees with him - setting up special courts for “traitors”,
defending the Election Commission as a “royal” institution etc - is
unfortunately a ‘viable’ candidate if this election is anything to go
by. This says a lot about the whole ‘race blind’ era some
opposition supporters claim we are witness to or are the Malays who
support Umno not Malaysians and therefore not part of this era. Rationality deficit
Meanwhile the very supporters who demand ‘ubah’ of so-called giant
oppositional parties, routinely mock PSM, a grassroots-level movement
that so far has displayed none of the business as usual mode of thinking
of the other. Indeed
amongst the appeals-to-emotions arguments and downright poppycock that
was heard during the Lynas fiasco, it was PSM’s Dr Michael Jeyakumar who presented a rational counter argument to all the baloney that was being fed to us.There seems to be a “rationality deficit” when it comes to oppositional
politics in this country. I will not bother taking digs at the
establishment since; they seem to be living in a strange world of denial
and delusion where the two factions within Umno seem to be waging a
‘Mordor and Isengard’ type offensive. I was surprised that PSM underestimated the “party not candidate”
sentiment, of the post-2008 political landscape ravaged by a tsunami
that neatly divided everything and everyone along party lines. PAS
getting a free ride when it comes to its Islamic credentials is evidence
of this. While
there much outrage over the recent whipping of women for whatever
offences they committed under Islamic law, there is not a peep from PAS,
as if such events would be a distant memory if they ever attained a
position of influence if they ever achieved federal power. As the main
defender of Islam and a supposed “moderate” one at that, surely they
should have reassured Malaysians, irrespective of race and religion of
their mainstream secular credentials. Of course, the loss of
“moderates” like Mohamad Sabu and his compatriots either because PAS
overestimated its reach or the whole “party not candidate” sentiment,
would have far reaching consequences for Pakatan Rakyat, not to mention
to the whole Selangor exco snafu that highlighted to the political
pedigree of certain PKR candidates. Delineation of constituencies
I have no idea why the prime minister would mention “lawyers” in his
little spiel, but I am sure BN, or should that just be Umno partisans,
would find much they would agree with Art Harun’s piece ‘Is BN a validly elected government’
which unusually (for Art) goes against the Pakatan Weltanschauung. In
it he writes, “The truth is this. It is without doubt that
delineation of constituencies have been made and used by the BN to
somewhat favour them. The question is whether that was legal or
constitutional. Why has there been no legal challenge? “But
why is it such a huge issue suddenly now? Because Pakatan lost the
GE13? What if Pakatan had won? Would it be an issue? Or would Pakatan be
ready to live under the same delineation just because it works for
them? “Was Pakatan willing to hedge its position prior to GE13 by not making any kind of noise about gerrymandering prior to GE13? I don't know.” Neither do I, but I agree with most of what Art says in this piece and in another, ‘Election petition - a note to YB Rafizi’.
Studying the elections results and revisiting the polemics from both
sides, I have no idea what is rational or irrational anymore here in
Malaysia. I do know that it will be another four years of partisan
nonsense with copious amounts of kool aid dispensed. Partisan politics
is always irrational. S THAYAPARAN is Commander (Rtd) of the Royal Malaysian Navy.