Rudyard Kipling"
“When you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldier”
General Douglas MacArthur"
“We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.”
“It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.” “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.
“The soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.”
“May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .” “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
“Nobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Quigonbond: While BN coalition is already caving in to demands of better revenue sharing with states, and promised to lower car prices, BN and Pakatan remains far apart. BN will continue to perpetuate the UMNO culture of corrupt commission taking, crony capitalism and monopoly over natural resources. For as long as Najib remains in power, only dribs and drabs of national wealth will trickle to the working class, brain drain will continue, and high income nation goal a pipe dream. Pakatan on the other hand has now offered a very compelling alternative - smash the UMNO culture, save enormous amounts of taxpayers' money from procurement, remove "bribery" cost of doing business, all of which will have a greater trickle down effect. The only thing Pakatan needs to do now is to stay disciplined and focused on its message, and bring home the majority. Even if Pakatan fails this time, UMNO culture is not going away, and there can only be more people to support Pakatan the next time.
GE13 SPECIAL
Well, the dates have finally been set and Malaysia heads towards the
most competitive electoral contest in the nation's history. It is
important to step back and look at how and why GE13 is competitive. The
broad reason is clear: this election offers the possibility of an
electoral transition of power. More power is in the hands of ordinary
Malaysians than ever before. The underlying dynamics that might make
this change happen however, are more obscure. This article - as
part of a special series of pieces on the polls - maps the contest
nationally and draws attention to fundamental shifts that are making the
May polls historic, whatever the outcome. The grey seats
The fierceness of the contest is evident in the numbers of seats that are "grey" - seats that can go either way. Looking
at a combination of factors in individual seats, the patterns of margin
of victory and history of vote swing, the changing number and
composition of voters, the candidate choices and infighting as well as
macro national and state shifts in voting behaviour drawn from my
fieldwork, I currently estimate that 42 percent of the parliamentary
seats nationally are ‘grey'. The BN can securely hold onto 32
percent of the total of 222 seats, while the opposition has the other 26
percent in the bag. We are looking at a contest where the results
cannot be predicted with certainty and where multiple factors will
affect the results in the remaining 23 days before polling. The
situation is indeed fluid, and either side can win power.
There
are two important observations to make about these grey seats. The first
is that many of the seats for the opposition are not secure, especially
in places such as Perak, Kedah and to a lesser extent, Selangor.
The reasons have to do with the fact that many of the opposition victories were with slim margins in 2008, such as Sibu and Sungai Siput.
The other decisive factor is that opposition seats disproportionately
have a large number of new and postal voters, some of these in
questionable proportions.
The classic example is Lembah Pantai,
a parliamentary constituency in Kuala Lumpur of 72,000 voters - it has a
whopping 18,000 new voters. This constituency also has over 22,000
postal and ‘early' voters, an increase of 7,000 voters.
The
second and perhaps most important observation is that over the past few
years the overwhelming majority of grey seats have come from the BN
base, including that of Umno.
As Najib Razak waited (and waited)
to call the polls, he has unwittingly increased the electoral
competitiveness and given the opposition more chances to gain seats.
Indeed, he is facing a case of diminishing returns.
Had Najib
opted to hold the election in November 2011, he would have walked into a
more favourable environment. Now, he and the BN coalition face serious
fights everywhere.
New frontiers, old stomping grounds
Make no bones about it, the BN holds a structural advantage in these
polls. This advantage is shaped by incumbency, the unevenness of the
electoral field, legitimate concerns about electoral irregularities and
dominance of state resources, especially money. How much of an
advantage these are will be determined in the days ahead. What
distinguishes GE13 from earlier polls however, is the broadening of the
national contest, outside of the traditional competitive areas. The distribution of these ‘grey' seats varies across the country, as
shown in the table below. More than a third of the competitive seats are
in the ‘fixed deposit' states - Sarawak, Johor and Sabah. The latter
has mistakenly been categorised as secure for the BN, but has a history
of risk-taking and voting for alternatives.
What makes this
campaign interesting in Sabah, among the many factors at play, is that
at question is whether Sabahans will continue to accept the means the
incumbent government has chosen to keep Sabah in their political orbit,
the dominance of Umno and weakening of the voices of non-Malay
bumiputera voters and the use of illegal immigrants, money and
vote-buying to shore up their position. These issues are very much being
tested.
In neighbouring Sarawak, concerns over corruption may be centre stage with the video
from Global Witness, but behind the scenes there are increasing
concerns with the rights of the Dayaks over land, governance and
representation which make the election more open.
Beyond the
dynamics in East Malaysia, the increased competitiveness nationally
comes in the very seats the BN delineated as its secure seats - seats
which are ethnicly mixed. The more mixed they are, the more likely they
offer an option for change. The various ethnic groups in Malaysia will
now collectively determine the nation's path ahead.
A second
observation is that the grey seats are all over the country, including
in Najib's home state of Pahang where problems in his own party,
differences in the BN coalition over seats and a blossoming
environmental movement have redefined loyalties. GE13 is truly about
issues, with developments in each state affecting the outcome. While
there are indeed new political frontiers, what happens throughout
Malaysia - including East Malaysia - will determine the results on May
5. Keep in mind we are talking about 35 seats changing hands for a new
government. In other words, this involves a change of around 15 percent
of Parliament and an average change in support of less than 10 percent
nationally. These gains are difficult given the constraints in
the electoral process and sharp battle lines, but not completely outside
the realm of the possible.
Redefined state-federal relations
The battleground is not just at the federal level. Of the 12 states
going to the polls, seven of these could go either way. They are Kedah,
Perlis, Negri Sembilan, Sabah, Selangor, Terengganu and Perak. While
the majority of these tilt toward BN, such as Terengganu, dynamics at
the state level are fluid and changing. The BN has a chance of winning
two states back - Kedah and Selangor - but at the same time, it is
facing a possible loss of nine state governments. The balance of power
in state governments has the potential to shift.
Whatever the
result, there is a reality of increasing decentralisation of power.
Since 2008, there has been more power in the hands of state governments.
In Penang and Selangor, leaders have adopted new policy frameworks and
individual states have been working to promote investment and growth
through state government-led initiatives. This election is a test
of whether this trend will continue. Given the promises of greater
resources to be placed in the power of individual states, in the promise
of oil revenue for example, this election will set the course for
further greater decision-making at the state level.
For
ordinary voters, this means that the votes they cast for state
assemblies are potentially as transformative as those at the national
level.
The prospects of change underscore these polls. The words ‘transformation' and ‘change' are also framing this election.
Najib
has systematically worked to cast his non-mandated government as one
that offers the greater possibility of a different Malaysia. The irony
in this messaging is stark, as a person who has been in the system for
nearly 40 years keeps casting himself as an agent of change.
He
has placed a high premium on voters to judge his mixed record of four
years in office as ‘reform' and at the same time accepting the idea that
change can come from within the system.
The reason Najib has
opted for this route is that he knows that the underlying driver in the
last three elections has been the call for reform and a desire for a
better Malaysia. This is high risk political messaging in that is
assumes that voters can distinguish Najib from the system he has been an
integral part of.
The opposition for its part has the ‘change'
momentum, but faces the challenge of clarifying what the reforms they
will bring and whether they can work together to get them done. Their
biggest obstacle, however, is winning over those who are cautious about
change and convincing voters to invest in a new path for the nation. As
the election campaigning proceeds, the battle over ‘change' will only
intensify, and the numbers in the table above will shift.
Malaysians
will ultimately decide the chances for change, but the political
landscape shows that change is already shaping the campaign.
DR BRIDGET WELSH is associate professor of political science at
Singapore Management University. She is travelling around Malaysia to
provide her GE13 analyses exclusively to Malaysiakini. Bridget can be reached at bwelsh@smu.edu.sg.