When
Dr Mahathir Mohamad is not worrying about the supposed ‘reforms' the
administration of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak plans to carry out
that will wreck havoc on the delicate social fabric of Malaysia, he's
worrying about the ‘trumped-up charges' that will be his downfall if
Pakatan Rakyat ever comes into power. I
don't think that the former prime minister has anything to worry about
with regard to the former, since the Najib regime has so far displayed
no sincere commitment to reforming the electoral process or any interest
in the slaying of Umno/Malay nationalist sacred cows.
If
anything, his deafening silence when it comes to ‘Malay' rights pressure
groups like Perkasa (which coincidently Mahathir is the patron of) or
Perkida is evidence that the hawks in Umno are ruling the roost. With
regard to the latter, I'm sure anyone who has been in power for as long
as this former strongman would be a tad anxious if the state apparatus
he controlled for so long, and still has influence over, was in the
control of another party.
It doesn't help that the contender to
the Putrajaya throne, Anwar Ibrahim - his former apprentice turned
bitter foe - has publically stated that he intends to aim his political
guns on the Umno top brass. I've always said that what Anwar
intends to do is maintain the ground-level political machinery of Umno
while cutting off the serpent's head. This way, PKR not only can
conjure up the grassroots level support of PAS but will have in its
control the well-oiled machinery of Umno chieftains who no doubt will
jump ship in the unlikely event of a Pakatan takeover of Putrajaya.
And in this way, or so the thinking goes by some PKR middle-grounders
I've spoken to, PKR will not be beholden to the Islamic impulses of PAS
in the long term. Lim
Kit Siang's rather twee rejoinder to Mahathir that he should not be an
impediment to buried financial skeletons being dug up aside, Mahathir
should not be overly concerned. After all, isn't Karpal Singh on record
as saying he would be willing to defend the former prime minister if the
need arose?
And even though the system has been compromised by
Umno, it has not reached a point where social order has broken down, the
level of desperation in the public has not reached breaking point, the
military has no direct influence and so, the fate of Mubarak or Gaddafi
is not for Mahathir. And trust me when I say this is a good thing. In
a follow-up piece, I intend to address the good doctor's concerns about
the vitriolic racial rhetoric that seems prevalent ever since he left
office. Here however, I'd like to make the argument that it does no good
for Pakatan, or for the rakyat, to go after the perpetrators of
political or social malfeasances in Umno or anywhere else should they
come into power.
No one is clean
Let
me be very clear that I think the money trail should be diligently
followed and all monies owed to the government retrieved. I have issues
with the way how Pakatan is running Selangor but Khalid Ibrahim has been
a shrewd operator in the way he has collected what is owed to the state
government, even though he has run into federal-influenced interference
in many instances. Crony deals should be renegotiated and the
culture of patronage should be abolished. Money politics, which like a
cancer has infected every organ of the government, should be sanctioned
by the law.
However, the culture of vindictiveness that Umno has
promulgated should end if and when the party loses power. Ever since
2008, when Pakatan became a viable ruling alternative, BN has been in
vindictive mode not seen since the early days of the Mahathir regime (or
maybe his whole tenure). Don't
like what the Bersih 3.0 protest says about the mood of the country?
Then attack its main proponent using outsourced thugs. Don't approve of
the criticisms levelled by the Bar Council on a host of issues? Publicly
discuss plans to set up an alternative legal body.
Have a
problem with a state for its opposition to the PTPTN scheme? Punish
students in the recalcitrant state (and then retreat from said position,
which makes it even worse). Losing the cyber propaganda war? Table an
amendment to the Evidence Act! Many people would say that if
Pakatan comes to power, there will be nothing vindictive about going
after "wrongdoers" who have profited from "leakages" (isn't this a term
coined by the honourable gentleman from Rembau?) and instituted
policies, economic and social that have led this country down a ruinous
path. This is, they would argue, merely justice.
I sympathise with this view, but I would remind them that nobody, BN or Pakatan, comes to this with clean hands. And
if you are naïve enough to think that there would be no backroom deals
between Pakatan and BN and convenient scapegoats offered to a
bloodthirsty public, then I suggest that you lay off the Pakatan
Kool-Aid. Old grudges that have been lying dormant for so long
in exiled BN members, now rehabilitated Pakatan diehards, would surface,
diluting the concept of ‘justice'. The newly-inherited political
machine has to be lubricated and ‘big fishes', although convenient
targets, are not necessarily the only predators causing mischief in
Malaysian waters.
Yes, we could spend the man hours and effort
(not to mention financial resources) honing in on the decades-long
governmental corruption that has plagued this country and unearth the
nexus between present day political personalities or their proxies who
were involved in scandals. Yes, we could discover the hidden
hands of big patronage businesses that to this very day have links to
both BN and Pakatan. We could unearth the sordid financial scandals that
leached public coffers and the greedy, stupid ‘cronycrats' that inhabit
the halls of power and drag them out into the light of ‘justice'.
And all, this would be played out in a now ‘free' press that would no
doubt satiate the desire of a certain segment of the voting public
frustrated by decades of governmental malfeasances. No doubt, this would
also soothe those who were at the mercy of the regime's security
apparatus and whose lives were destroyed for voicing dissent.
Freak shows
And
the tragedy is that all this would detract from the serious work of
carrying out institutional reforms that this country desperately needs. I
would argue that this freak shows would also give the new ruling regime
the perfect opportunity to get conveniently sidetracked from the real
work of making reforms that it pledged the voters. I would much
rather have some sort of general amnesty policy instituted, as far as
financial corruption scandals are concerned, with an admission of guilt
and a return of money as a ‘get out of jail' card.
It goes
without saying that they and their proxies would never be able to do
business with the government again. I have no doubt they would even be
supplicants from Pakatan but if nobody steps up, then of course the full
force of the law should be deployed. What we (and by ‘we' I mean
anybody interested in real reforms, not necessarily Pakatan partisans)
are talking about, and I assume this is the ideological bedrock of
Pakatan, is serious institutional reform that would take dedicated
long-term commitment.
We are not only talking about changing the
mindset in a variety of government bodies; we are talking about
changing the mindset of a majority community suckling on the teat of
political party benevolence in the guise of government service, for
instance. We are talking about transparency, professionalism and
the re-creation of government bodies not beholden to their political
masters.
Put it this way: I would rather have a
newly-constituted, independent Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission
(MACC) watching the newly-elected regime like hawks for any sign of
corruption than one that's mucking about with the former regime's
malfeasances. We are talking about changes that would affect the
very fabric of the Malaysian polity, changes that would be terrifying to
the current ruling regime. And these changes would have to be made in
chaotic circumstances, where roles are being redefined, and no doubt
where Pakatan in its supposed class-based approach would run into the
realpolitik of race and Islamic preoccupations from its erstwhile
component pact members.
But all this is wishful thinking. Like
many others, I am sceptical of Pakatan claiming the Putrajaya throne.
The numbers game is against them. And even if they do win, like the PKNS
fiasco demonstrates, there's a strong whiff that maybe Pakatan is not
as committed to the reform that it aspires to.
In the current
political reality, something is better than nothing, I suppose, although
I may have to dust off my own personal three-letter acronym, BAU or
business as usual. This reflects the nebulous change that Pakatan
offers, all the while cognisant of traditional BN values.
Malaysiakini
