The ‘Arab Spring’ shows that democratic process is useless without democratic culture. A
few weeks ago, amid the “Arab Spring” giddiness, a Shiite mosque opened
in Cairo. This was big news. Among Egypt’s 80 million people, there are
only a few thousand Shiites. It’s a 90 percent Sunni country, with even
Christians vastly outnumbering the Shia. So, in their euphoria over the
mosque’s inauguration, Shiite clerics heralded this Husseiniya (as
Shiite mosques are known) as a symbol of rapprochement. The mosque would
bridge the sectarian divide: a Shia center in this bustling Sunni city,
yet a house of worship, thus emphasizing what unites rather than
divides Muslims in one of Islam’s most important nations.
Such stories were once the hallmark of the Arab Spring narrative.
“Democracy” was in the air. The corrupt, cancerous, pro-American
dictator was gone. With their yearning hearts now sated by freedom,
Egyptians would pull together, the light of liberty guiding them to
prosperity.
The stories are different now. The Husseiniya was shut down
last week. Yesterday’s euphoria is melting into today’s harsh reality.
In Cairo, home to the Muslim Brotherhood and the sharia jurists of
ancient Al-Azhar University, “democracy” has meant the rise of Sunni
supremacists. Turns out they don’t do bridge-building. Their tightening
grip has translated into brutalizing dhimmitude for Christians and
increasing intolerance of Shiism — which the Sunni leaders perceive less
as Islam than as apostasy, an offense that sharia counts as more
grievous than treason.
News of the mosque’s demise arrived shortly after a report entitled “ Neocons vs. Islamophobes” by the leftist e-magazine Salon.
Foreign-policy correspondent Jordan Michael Smith was good enough to
appoint me leader of “what might be called the ‘to-hell-with-democracy’
strain of thought” in “the American conservative movement.” And if
anything needs an Arab Spring, it must be the American conservative
movement. We Islamophobes haven’t even had an election yet, much less
gotten one of those mellifluous sharia-constitutions the State
Department likes to write for its emerging “democracies,” and yet here I
am the leader! And a “relentless” leader, too — scalding the Muslim
Brotherhood on behalf of a cadre that allegedly includes such luminaries
as John Bolton, Michele Bachmann, and Frank Gaffney.
In our struggle “to
define the Republican response to the increased power of political
Islam,” we are said to be “vying” with “another faction among the
right-wing that is equally powerful . . . the neoconservatives.”
Counting among their number such heavyweights as GOP senators John
McCain and Lindsey Graham, they are portrayed as “rather admirably
insisting that the Muslim Brotherhood be given a chance.” After the
tumultuous Bush years, my friends Norman Podhoretz, Paul Wolfowitz, and
Bill Kristol must be having a good laugh: It may have taken a motley
crew of despicable Islamophobes, but the Left has suddenly decided that
neocons may not be the root of all evil after all.
For all its pretensions to sober analysis, the Salon
hit piece usefully demonstrates how nonsensical policy debates about
the Arab Spring have become. There is no common understanding of basic
terms. “Islamophobia” was coined by the Muslim Brotherhood and
seamlessly adopted by its Western confederates. Taken literally, the
word would mean “irrational fear of Islam” — and thus it would rarely
need to be spoken, Islamic supremacists having given us much to fear
quite rationally. But in common parlance, to sneer “Islamophobe” is like
what sneering “neocon” has hitherto been: lefty demagoguery — in this
case, the belittling of anyone who is critical of Islam and its sharia
framework, regardless of how colorable the critique.
Most people know an insult when they hear one. When it is rank
character assassination posing as argument, people of good will tune it
out. More consequential, though, is the degrading of the term
“democracy.” As applied to the “Islamophobes,” Mr. Smith’s invocation of
“democracy” — as in, to hell with it — is an outright perversion. Like
the giants of neoconservatism, critics of Islamic supremacism (what Salon
gently calls “political Islam”) are lovers of democracy. We believe the
world would be a better place if every country adopted it. We agree the
United States ought to be its promotional beacon. But that is mainly
because when we speak of “democracy,” we mean American democracy.
That is a culture of liberty so deeply rooted in the United States that
it predated by a couple of centuries the American Revolution, the U.S.
Constitution, and the first federal elections. National Review
|